Shawhan: Time for USWNT to consider benching Carli Lloyd

One could point to many factors in trying to explain the U.S. Women’s National Team’s recent last-place finish at their own SheBelieves Cup mini-tournament. France’s expert exploitation of the inherent vulnerabilities of head coach Jill Ellis’ experimental 3-4-1-2 formation, for one, magnified by the USWNT’s ongoing struggle to adapt to that formation, some questionable personnel choices and poor performances by good players at the worst possible time.

One cause that deserves more attention, though, is the poor play of team co-captain Carli Lloyd.

Lloyd started all three tournament matches and played 245 minutes as the nominal playmaker underneath the U.S. forwards. In that role she had no goals, no assists, few incisive passes and little impact. On the whole, her performance over the course of the SheBelieves Cup ranged from ineffective to invisible.

In and of itself, this poor showing would perhaps be cause for concern, but not gravely so: Even great players have temporary drops in form. And Lloyd and those around her were attempting to adjust to a new tactical setup against top opposition, so some growing pains can be expected.

The trouble is that Lloyd’s poor SheBelieves Cup does not stand by itself. It is the latest in a whole string of similar poor showings, dating back at least to last year’s Olympic qualifiers, which together should at the very least call into question whether Lloyd should continue to own a WNT starting spot.

That may seem like a radical suggestion. This is Carli Lloyd we’re talking about, after all – team co-captain, scorer of big goals in big games, she of the justly-acclaimed 15-minute hat trick in the 2015 World Cup final.

But no career, no matter how distinguished, lasts forever. No player, no matter how ferocious their work ethic, can hold off the effects of time indefinitely. And the time has come to ask whether Lloyd’s slow downward slide in performance has now passed the point of no return at international level.

Lloyd’s game is built on mobility – on covering lots of ground, harrying the opposition, opening up space to make her famous freight-train runs into the attacking third. But Lloyd is almost 35, with hundreds of matches in her legs, and the mobility she relies upon seems to have faded of late.

This was evident at the SheBelieves Cup, where Ellis’s explicit tactical instructions were for Lloyd to remain in place and wait for the ball, for all the world like someone cherry-picking in a pickup game of Ultimate Frisbee. And it was evident at last summer’s Olympics and the Olympic qualifiers before that, in which all too often one saw Lloyd jogging back and forth, barely touching the ball.

Lloyd is still a terror if she gets the ball faced up toward goal with a little bit of room in front of her; but it is now all too easy for opponents to keep her from getting into that position in the first place.

Lloyd’s lack of mobility has important knock-on consequences for the team as a whole. A running criticism of the USWNT for at least the last year has been its struggles to break down a team set up in a compact low block (or, in WNT-approved jargon, a “bunker”).

Such struggles may have many causes. But one contributing factor is surely that one of the WNT’s principal attacking players no longer has the legs to find space, receive and circulate the ball, drag defenses out of shape, and open up new passing options in the attacking third.

Lloyd’s lack of mobility makes it all too easy for a low-block defense to keep her – and the rest of the U.S. midfield – in front of them.

Lloyd’s ineffectiveness as an attacking force in the center also exacerbates the existing U.S. tendency to route all of their attacks down the wings. This makes those attacks easier to anticipate, and brings the sideline into play as a de facto additional defender. Plus, the fact that Lloyd is frequently not a workable passing option means that the movement of the ball from flank to flank usually has to run through the U.S. holding midfielders rather than higher up the pitch, making it ponderous and predictable.

In explaining her current experiment to the 3-4-1-2, Jill Ellis has said that her goal is for the team to play more on the front foot by adding an additional attacker into the mix. This added attacking impetus and pressure, presumably, will make up for the increased space out wide that the formation makes available to opposing wide players, and the resulting increased pressure on the U.S. midfield and defense if and when the ball turns over.

Adding one more attacker into the same area, though, without changing the U.S.’s underlying inability to rapidly move the ball – and thus move the opponent – isn’t going to get the job done. And that’s especially true when the “1” in the 3-4-1-2, the theoretical link between midfield and forwards, is little more than a passenger.

Lloyd’s limitations do not just show up against teams playing a more defensive style, either. As Germany and France showed during the SheBelieves Cup, the other way to beat the USWNT to press them higher up the field and deny the back line and the midfield double-pivot space and time to build attacks from the back.

To combat this tactic requires players who excel at moving constantly off the ball and offering passing angles, who are comfortable and composed when receiving the ball in tight spaces and then moving it on quickly. These, unfortunately, are not Lloyd’s strengths at this point in her career.

In short, Lloyd’s physical and technical limitations mean that with her in the lineup, the U.S. is effectively going to be playing numbers down whenever they face a well-coached, well-prepared side, whether that side is a comparative minnow or the best in the world. In the SheBelieves Cup, the result was merely embarrassing. In the next World Cup (or for that matter the subsequent Olympics), the consequences would be far more grave.

To be sure, the USWNT is still very much in the experiment-and-develop point of the cycle. There is time to address the weaknesses exposed in this year’s SheBelieves Cup. But that very length of time presents its own difficulties. The next World Cup is not until June 2019 – just before Lloyd’s 37th birthday.

If Lloyd’s mobility and her overall involvement in play are this limited now, what will they be like two years from now? And if her legs will not be up to the physical demands of one more World Cup, why should she still get substantial playing time while rising stars like Rose Lavelle are forced to play out of position?

Ellis’ consistent theme over the past year is that this is a time of turnover for the USWNT, a time of refreshing the side and deepening the player pool. Yet for all the moves that Ellis has genuinely made in that direction, all the new call-ups and first caps, she has left Lloyd in place in midfield with little to show for it.

It’s time to seriously discuss why that state of affairs should continue – and whether it’s finally time to talk about benching Carli Lloyd.

By | March 16, 2017 | 17 Comments | Tags: , , , , ,


  1. Jim Alich says:

    Jill is starting to coach like Klinsman. Maybe the starting point is replacing Jill. Got a World Cup but the experimentation os looking more and more like what Jurgen was doing. And Carli, the great player that she was, is just plain slow now.

  2. tonysocref says:

    Looks like somebody else is going to be blocked by Lloyd :-)

  3. Sutt50 says:

    This was and is a very hard story to read. We’ve watched, enjoyed, rooted on and for the ladies soccer team since back when Julie Foudy and Mia Hamm and the rest of all those awesome ladies made the progress they did. Those ladies left and new ones come in. Carli Lloyd has been playing her heart out for yrs. If anyone would just look back at the goals she’s scored and the many minutes she’s been on the field. My Daughter has played sports all her life. Did she ever make a mistake, sure. Did she ever have a perfect game in anything she played absolutely not. No one does! Give her a break. Look at some of the other players out there working their butts off also. Except for about 4-5 out there playing they need to re exam there decision. The new goalie needs a lot of practice to. I’m far from saying she’s not good but needs help. I think too the coach isn’t up to par either. This is strictly my opinion and I mean no disrespect. Rights right! Wrongs wrong!

  4. Agapao13 says:

    I was praying someone with influence and knowledge of what constitutes effective player performance would speak up concerning Lloyds poor and damaging performances. How about a coach that understands and commands world class team soccer – that is not Jill.

  5. Steven Casale says:

    I find it foolish that the poor play of the USWNT who decided to experiment with a new formation is put at the feet of Carli Lloyd. She is still the most dynamic player on that team regardless of her age and Ellis needs to build that team around Lloyd. The new formation was attempted now go back to a tried and true tested 4 back defense and work in some of the new talent but DON’T make this about Lloyd……

    • DNG says:

      “She is still the most dynamic player on that team”

      She was NEVER the most dynamic player on the team. In what ways is Lloyd dynamic player in your eyes? I’ve only ever seen a pretty effective but one dimensional player. Her legs are gone now though and the game has moved past her. It’s time for a change.

    • LovetheUSWNT says:

      You have never played the game. You watch and feel with American eyes.Look what a defensive liability she is.Her ego is what pushes her on.Not the love of the team. If she was a true leader.She would let go.

  6. csmith says:

    Finally, someone is taking notice (and commenting) on Ellis’ not-so-great decision-making and tactics. Personally, I’ve always thought Carli Lloyd was sporadic – great when she’s on, but ineffectual (and prone to losing the ball) when she’s off. But I’m not even going to blame her for what’s happening to USWNT right now.
    We came off the World Cup minus a few familiar faces, but with our solid backline still intact. The key faces missing were all midfielders or forwards. What did Ellis do at this critical point? She started experimenting, shifting the backline and all but benching Ali Krieger most noticeably. We had a horrible Olympic showing. Then when Solo was suspended, and our “new” goalies were given more playing time and trying to earn the starting spot, did Ellis give them a tried and tested wall of support? No, again she kept subbing new lineups in here, including the very questionable use of Allie Long in a backline (out of position) but especially on a defense now utilizing three players instead of four. Again, while world-class defender Krieger was mostly on the bench (and Klingenberg is out too I guess). That’s downright crazy.
    Is Lloyd past her prime? Maybe, but frankly I think what’s wrong with the USWNT right now is Ellis, and until somebody with a little more savvy and willingness to reevaluate her own game plan is in charge, no one on this team will shine.
    I will say that with world-class forwards, it’s also frustrating that Ellis thinks we need even more attackers (at the expense of defense) to score. She thinks she can put midfielders (and forwards) on the backline and forwards in the midfield and we’ll be a better attacking team, when all that does is cause chaos and too many wanna-be scorers and not enough players who are experienced at defense and ball-handling and crosses.
    Ellis is correct that this is a time of transition for the team, but who in their right mind would try and transition not just new faces into the mix, but players (such as Long) into new roles they aren’t equipped for, and a new lineup in front of new goalies, etc. I think that’s what should be addressed first, before sacking Lloyd.

  7. vee maac says:

    Yeah totally and Alex morgan too. Myabe add in christen press too they played poorly and didnt even score… them being the “best” strikers that can score a lot of goals should be scoring. Might as well only have Heath and sauerbrunn on the pitch.

    • Old Soldier says:

      Morgan flew back to France after the cup, played a full 90 minutes in a quarter-final game, scoring 3 goals, and the very next game last Saturday scored two goals. That’s 5 goals in two games. The issue is Ellis puts players in positions and formations on the field who cannot generate an offense-and those players do not include Morgan. The mix of players in the midfield was a disaster, and they often looked like they were competing with each other, and not the opposing team.
      Pugh and Morgan were both separated and isolated by Ellis’s tactics,
      and by a midfield that created nothing.

  8. Arcie Tillydee says:

    Excellent, well-written argument, and I agree completely. Although I can’t imagine it will sit well with her, Lloyd is probably best used as an impact sub. It’s time to start getting Lavelle serious experience in the the CAM role, well in advance of WWC19.

    • DNG says:

      I like Lavelle but I’m not totally convinced she’s be a better all around playmaker than Morgan Brian. She’s the better dribbler and has more flair but Brian is the better overall distributer with better range on her passes.

      • 3-5-2 says:

        I see your point and would argue that Brian, while indubitably an excellent passer, is at her best when played as a deep-lying playmaker, I don’t see her as a classic #10. That’s Lavelle’s best position, though.

        • Steve Schaffner says:

          Sounds like the kind of question that should be settled by experimentation. Maybe the USWNT should host some kind of mini-tournament that would let them try out these options.

        • DNG says:

          My hesitation is that Brian is not really a tempo setter. That was Allie Long’s role for most of 2016. Brian excels at distribution in the attacking third and helping the team build up. I think Brian has struggled to adjust to a holding roles somewhat. She at least has not filled the promise that she had when she graduate from UVA

  9. ExCastleFan says:

    Thank you for writing this! It needed to be said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *